I see what they mean. An app that links to all the medevial manuscripts online.
That's what the article in Science Daily is all about.
I think the argument, in their case, was this - that it was time consuming and required a bit of work to find these scanned manuscripts online.
You gotta scuffle through all the blogs and other data out there before you hit jackpot.
Reason I paraphrased the argument of the article is because, as a general rule, I would be quite particular about what keywords I used to google something. So that I increased my chances of finding the relevant data in a short period of time.
To that effect, I wondered what they meant about Google not bringing up the cambridge manuscript. I mean, yea, Googling "Edward the Confesssor" results in epic failure but that's not what I would have used anyway.
Try "Cambridge manuscript edward" for luck.
Well, the important point is, this search engine annoyance resulted in a brilliant site that catalogues medevial docs. Hurrah! I am happy about that.
Here is the link to Catalogue of Digitized Medieval Manuscripts
AI’s Transformative Impact On Web Design: Supercharging Productivity Across
The Industry
-
Discover how AI is reshaping web design, boosting productivity in design,
coding, UX, and copywriting while amplifying human creativity in a new
article by...
1 day ago
0 comments:
Post a Comment